Skip to content
01 — Work

Four systems, and the trade-offs they cost.

Each of these is written the way I would explain it in a design review: what could not change, what I rejected and why, what the decision cost, and what the numbers did afterwards.


01
Berijalan Technocenter
2024

Sales Performance Dashboard

A sales performance dashboard recomputed everything on demand against a legacy system I was not allowed to touch, query directly, or ask for a push feed. Here is what I could change, and what it cost.

KafkaCDCSpring BootAlibaba CloudResilience4j
Outcome

~3 min → < 1 s, CPU spikes gone


02
Integrity Asia
2025

ATS / HRIS Connector Platform

One integration platform configured per client at runtime, instead of a fork per customer in code — and no engineering work required from the client to onboard.

Spring BootAzureWorkdayManatalIdempotency
Outcome

Zero client engineering to onboard


03
Integrity Asia
2025

AI-Assisted Delivery Pipeline

A delivery pipeline where a planner model scopes the ticket, cheaper models implement it, and the planner reviews the diff against its own plan — with a human gate where it belongs.

Azure DevOpsModel routingCI / CD
Outcome

Routine fixes ship without a human in the loop


04
Open source
Apache-2.0

encrypted-search-service

Substring search over personal data without reversible encryption — field-scoped, key-rotatable, and built so that a leaked index yields hashes rather than names.

Java 25Spring Boot 4.1OpenSearchHMAC n-gramsVirtual threadsTestcontainers
Outcome

An index leak yields hashes, not names